Khalif

[~NoorMuhammed~]

Salam aleikum

Hvem var med i den forsamling som udvalgte den første khalif?



Ws.

[Musliman]

wa alaykum as-salam

Salam aleikum

Hvem var med i den forsamling som udvalgte den første khalif?



Ws.

En del ansar og nogle muhajirin.
Næste dag blev der igen holdt afstemning i masjid an-nabawi hvor sahaba havde mulighed for at give bayat til Abu Bakr as-Sadiq og dette er kendt som den generelle bayat. Alle sahaba der var til stede gav bayat til Abu Bakr (ra).

Ali (ra) og zubair (ra) var dog ikke mødt op. Efter Abu Bakr bad nogle fra ansar om at kalde på dem, gav de bayat til ham af egen fri vilje (ingen tvang eller taqiya).

Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and other Muhaajir Sahabah did not take part in this Bay’at because they were engaged in the burial arrangements of Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam) and they did not even know what transpired outside the house. One cannot say that Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and other Muhaajir Sahabah’s failure to take the Bay’at was because they disagreed with it, rather this is the reason why those Sahabah who were not present at the time of the Bay’at were not taunted. A general Majlis took place the following day in the Masjid-un-Nabawi for everybody to take the Bay’at so that nobody could raise any objection to Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) being the Khalifah and that he did this in secret.
On the following day Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) sat on the mimbar in the Masjid-un-Nabawi and Umar (Radhiallaahu Anhu) stood in front of the Sahabah and said a few words and also excused himself for what he had said on hearing of the demise of Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam). He further said that: “Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam) has passed away and you have the Qur’an with you.” Umar (Radhiallaahu Anhu) then pointed towards Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and mentioned his virtues and that he is more worthy of Khilaafat and everybody should take Bay’at on his hands. All the Sahabah present in the Masjid took Bay’at on the hands of Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and this was known as the general Bay’at. At the time of this Bay’at two very important and famous Sahabah, i.e. Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and Zubair (Radhiallaahu Anhu) were not present. Hazrat Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) enquired of their whereabouts. A few Sahabah of the Ansaar stood up and called Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and Zubair (Radhiallaahu Anhu) to the Masjid. When these two Sahabah (Radhiallaahu Anhu) arrived at the Masjid, Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) asked Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu): “Why haven’t you taken Bay’at inspite of you being the cousin and son in-law of Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam)? Do you wish to cause disunity amongst the Muslims?” On hearing this Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) excused himself “and took Bay’at willingly “on the hands of Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu). Then Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) asked Zubair (Radhiallaahu Anhu) the same question and also asked him that: “Inspite of being the cousin of Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam) and a Hawaari, do you wish to create disunity amongst the Muslims?” He too excused himself and took Bay’at on the hands of Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu).

http://askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?aski ... d6b9a019b1

[~NoorMuhammed~]

wa alaykum as-salam

Salam aleikum

Hvem var med i den forsamling som udvalgte den første khalif?



Ws.

En del ansar og nogle muhajirin.
Næste dag blev der igen holdt afstemning i masjid an-nabawi hvor sahaba havde mulighed for at give bayat til Abu Bakr as-Sadiq og dette er kendt som den generelle bayat. Alle sahaba der var til stede gav bayat til Abu Bakr (ra).

Ali (ra) og zubair (ra) var dog ikke mødt op. Efter Abu Bakr bad nogle fra ansar om at kalde på dem, gav de bayat til ham af egen fri vilje (ingen tvang eller taqiya).

Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and other Muhaajir Sahabah did not take part in this Bay’at because they were engaged in the burial arrangements of Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam) and they did not even know what transpired outside the house. One cannot say that Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and other Muhaajir Sahabah’s failure to take the Bay’at was because they disagreed with it, rather this is the reason why those Sahabah who were not present at the time of the Bay’at were not taunted. A general Majlis took place the following day in the Masjid-un-Nabawi for everybody to take the Bay’at so that nobody could raise any objection to Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) being the Khalifah and that he did this in secret.
On the following day Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) sat on the mimbar in the Masjid-un-Nabawi and Umar (Radhiallaahu Anhu) stood in front of the Sahabah and said a few words and also excused himself for what he had said on hearing of the demise of Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam). He further said that: “Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam) has passed away and you have the Qur’an with you.” Umar (Radhiallaahu Anhu) then pointed towards Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and mentioned his virtues and that he is more worthy of Khilaafat and everybody should take Bay’at on his hands. All the Sahabah present in the Masjid took Bay’at on the hands of Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and this was known as the general Bay’at. At the time of this Bay’at two very important and famous Sahabah, i.e. Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and Zubair (Radhiallaahu Anhu) were not present. Hazrat Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) enquired of their whereabouts. A few Sahabah of the Ansaar stood up and called Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) and Zubair (Radhiallaahu Anhu) to the Masjid. When these two Sahabah (Radhiallaahu Anhu) arrived at the Masjid, Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) asked Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu): “Why haven’t you taken Bay’at inspite of you being the cousin and son in-law of Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam)? Do you wish to cause disunity amongst the Muslims?” On hearing this Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) excused himself “and took Bay’at willingly “on the hands of Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu). Then Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) asked Zubair (Radhiallaahu Anhu) the same question and also asked him that: “Inspite of being the cousin of Rasoolullah (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wasallam) and a Hawaari, do you wish to create disunity amongst the Muslims?” He too excused himself and took Bay’at on the hands of Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu).

http://askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?aski ... d6b9a019b1

Der står lidt om Zubair, men kan du fortælle mig mere om ham? og hvorfor skrev Profeten (as) ikke sin testemente?

Umar (Radhiallaahu Anhu) mentioned in detail during his Khilaafat that Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) went to Saqeefa Bani Saaidah in order to clarify and explain to the Ansaar. He did not know that in the interim he would have the responsibility of appointing a Khalifah. This is also the reason why he did not take Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) with him.(jf.link)

men hvorfor ville den første khalif ikke have at Imam Ali skulle have ansvaret for at udpege en khalif?

[Abu Saif]

hvorfor skulle det være Ali ra?
google zubair ibn al awam så kan du læse om ham.

[Musliman]

Der står lidt om Zubair, men kan du fortælle mig mere om ham?

Hvad er det nøjagtigt du vil vide om ham, udover det der bliver nævnt i teksten?

hvorfor skrev Profeten (as) ikke sin testemente?

Profeten salla lāhu 'alayhi wa sallam sagde at han ikke efterlader arv (sahih Muslim)

men hvorfor ville den første khalif ikke have at Imam Ali skulle have ansvaret for at udpege en khalif?

Svaret er at finde i det du citerer:

Umar (Radhiallaahu Anhu) mentioned in detail during his Khilaafat that Abu Bakr (Radhiallaahu Anhu) went to Saqeefa Bani Saaidah in order to clarify and explain to the Ansaar. He did not know that in the interim he would have the responsibility of appointing a Khalifah. This is also the reason why he did not take Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) with him.(jf.link)

Ali (ra) gav bayat til Abu Bakr (ra) af egen fri vilje, og det viser hans støtte til Abu Bakr (ra). De følgende beretninger viser meget godt hvilken respekt Ali (ra) havde for Abu Bakr (ra)

Muhammed ibn al-Hanafiya, sayyiduna ‘Alis (radi Allahu ‘anhu) søn, beretter, at han spurgte sin far: “Hvem er det bedste menneske efter Allahs Sendebud (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam)?”. ‘Ali sagde: “Abu Bakr”. Muhammed ibn al-Hanafiya spurgte: “Hvem efter ham?” Og ‘Ali svarede: “‘Umar”. [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 57, Number 20].

sayyiduna ‘Ali (radi Allahu ‘anhu) holdt en prædiken og spurgte: “Hvem er bedst af dette folk (Ummah) efter dets Profet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam)? Jeg svarede: “Det er du, Oh De troendes behersker!” Han sagde: “Nej, de bedste i dette folk efter dets Profet er Abu Bakr og ‘Umar!” [Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, hadith no 793].

Jeg har lige et spørgsmål til dig, bror/søster.
Er du en shia? Før i tiden viste du en shia-bog som kilde for en hadith i dit signatur. Det kan jeg se du har fjernet/ladet være med at gøre mere. Hvorfor det?